Before Advocating To Repeal Section 230, It Helps To First Understand How It Works
From the maybe-question-everything-a-little-more? dept
Why Making Social Media Companies Liable For User Content Doesn’t Do What Many People Think It Will
From the how-stuff-works dept
5 Tips For Proving Your Legal Department’s Value
Join our expert panel on March 3rd at 1pm ET to explore actionable, emerging ways you can gather and proactively share the data that demonstrates the impact of your work.
Third Circuit’s Section 230 TikTok Ruling Deliberately Ignores Precedent, Defies Logic
From the that's-not-how-any-of-this-works dept.
Court To RFK Jr.: Fact-Checking Doesn’t Violate 1st Amendment Nor Does Section 230 Make Meta A State Actor
From the that's-not-how-any-of-this-works dept.
Ninth Circuit Dumps Lawsuit Against YouTube Brought By Anti-Vaxxer Whose Account Was Terminated
Why do these lawsuits keep getting filed?
Humans in the Loop: The People Powering Trusted Legal AI
As the use of artificial intelligence permeates legal practice, a critical question confronts every legal professional who uses these tools: Can I trust this?
Congress Wants A Magic Pony: Get Rid Of Section 230, Perfect Moderation, And Only Nice People Allowed Online
From the the-land-of-magical-thinking dept
Fentanyl Death Suit Against Snapchat Could Signal Change In Section 230’s Protection
Social media is a dangerous place. Especially when hosts do little to mitigate the risks.
Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI
This bill would be a danger to the internet.
Hawley, Blumenthal Team Up To Push Nonsensical AI/230 Bill
Did an AI write this?
How LexisNexis State Net Uses Gen AI To Tame Gov’t Data
Its new features transform how you can track and analyze the more than 200,000 bills, regulations, and other measures set to be introduced this year.
Taamneh Case Gave Us A Glimpse Of The Horror Websites Would Face In A Post-Section 230 World
Sliding doors SCOTUS edition
Your ‘Simple Solution’ To Section 230 Is Bad: Julia Angwin Edition
That's not how any of this works.
The Only Thing That May Be More Interesting Than The Section 230 Cases Is That It’s The Same Lawyer, Twice
It’s like the Spider-Man pointing meme, but legal!
Morning Docket: 02.23.23
* Another effort to strike "non-lawyer" from the industry vernacular. Deploying the phrase to denigrate other professionals is bad, but... it's pretty important for a host of ethical reasons that folks know if their law firm contact is a lawyer or not. [Law.com] * Shocking absolutely no one, when faculty met to discuss an effort by some Christian law students to get official recognition for new clubs to exclude LGBTQ students, the meeting was recorded and leaked to Fox News. Because the whole point for these initiatives is to get on Fox News. But now police are involved and students are getting a crash course in the difference between one- and two-party consent states. [NHPR] * Alex Murdaugh's lawyer pulled a gun on the prosecutor? Meh, seems par for this course. [Intelligencer] * Even if Section 230 survives, it won't shield ChatGPT. [Lawfare] * Regulators are starting to think billion-dollar crypto deals might be a problem. Welcome to the party. [Reuters]